Circulating tumor cells in cancer-risk populations as a cancer interception tool.

Cancer interception (CI) is a new approach to cancer prevention and treatment in a cancer-risk population that aims to detect and treat pre-tumoral stages. It has several potential advantages over traditional cancer diagnosis and monitoring methods because it is non-invasive, making it less painful and risky than conventional biopsy procedures. The circulating tumor cells (CTCs), liquid biopsy family members, are essential for the CI approach; then, the liquid biopsy (LB) is used as a CI tool. LB can be performed frequently because of its easy sampling and early pathological stages, which allow repeated non-invasive monitoring of cancer progression and response to treatment. CTCs have been found in the bloodstream of several types of cancer patients, including in early-stage cancer and premalignant lesions, suggesting a tumor development role in cancer's early stages. This chapter will present foundational scientific studies addressing CI and the clinical impact of CTC screening in a population at risk for cancer.

microRNAs signature in relapse metastasis and de novo metastasis of breast cancer. A systematic review.

miRNAs have been widely identified as important players in cancer development and progression. Metastasis in breast cancer can occur as relapse of a treated primary tumour or at the time of diagnosis of the tumour. The aim of this review is to show if both metastasis are different molecular entities characterised by different miRNA signatures that could be studied as specific biomarkers for each entity. For this, we systematically searched the PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases. After searching and reviewing the literature, a total of 30 records were included in this review. Results showed a genetic signature including a total of 5 upregulated miRNAs in metastasis compared with early stages. Of them, miR-23b and miR-200c were exclusively present in relapse metastasis. Finally, we proposed a molecular signature for future studies that can be used as a complementary tool at clinical trials for the diagnosis and characterization of metastasis.

Identification of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer germline variants in Granada (Spain): NGS perspective.

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of germline variants in cancer-predisposing genes by either targeted (BRCA1/2) or multigene NGS panel in a high-risk Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) cohort. Samples from 824 Caucasian probands were retrospectively collected and the impact of genetic diagnosis and genetic variants epidemiology in this cohort was evaluated. Performance of risk-reducing prophylactic measures, such as prophylactic mastectomy and/or prophylactic oophorectomy, was assessed through clinical follow-up of patients with a positive genetic result. Pathogenic variants predisposing to HBOC were identified in 11.9% (98/824) individuals at BRCA2 (47/98), BRCA1 (24/98), PALB2 (8/51), ATM (7/51), CHEK2 (6/51) MSH6, (2/51), RAD51C (2/51) and TP53 (2/386). Of them, 11 novel pathogenic variants and 12 VUS were identified, characterized, and submitted to ClinVar. Regarding clinical impact, the risk of developing basal or Her2 breast cancer was increased 15.7 times or 37.5 times for BRCA1 and MSH6 pathogenic variants respectively. On the contrary, the risk of developing basal or luminal A breast cancer was reduced to 81% or 77% for BRCA2 and BRCA1 pathogenic variants, respectively. Finally, 53.2% of individuals testing positive for class IV/V variants underwent prophylactic surgery (mastectomy, oophorectomy or both) being significantly younger at the cancer diagnosis than those undertaking prophylactic measures (p = 0.008). Of them, 8 carried a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in other genes different from BRCA1 and BRCA2, and the remaining (46.7%) decided to continue with clinical follow-up. No differences in pathogenicity or risk of developing cancer were found for BRCA1/2 between targeted and multigene sequencing strategies; however, NGS was able to resolve a greater proportion of high-risk patients.

Exchange of cellular components between platelets and tumor cells: impact on tumor cells behavior.

Background: Platelets are active players in tumorigenesis, although the exact interactive mechanisms and their direct impact on tumor cells remain largely unknown. Methods: Bidirectional transference of lipids, proteins and RNA between platelets and tumor cells and its impact on tumor cell behavior and tumor process are analyzed in this work. Phenotypic, genetic and functional modifications induced by platelets were analyzed both in tumor cell lines and in circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Results: Data from these assays showed that platelets transferred structural components to tumor cells with higher efficiency than tumor cells to platelets (p = 0.001). This biological interplay occurred by direct contact, internalization or via extracellular vesicles. As a result, tumor cells acquired platelet markers (CD61 and CD42), showed decreased EpCAM, expressed epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition markers, and increased proliferation rates. Moreover, we were able to detect CD61 in CTCs from early and advanced prostate cancer. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated, for the first time, that platelets educate tumor cells by highly efficient transference of lipids, proteins and RNA through different mechanisms. These results suggest that tumor cells and CTCs might acquire highly dynamic and aggressive phenotypes due to platelets interaction including EMT, stem-like phenotype and high proliferative rates.

Cooperative and Escaping Mechanisms between Circulating Tumor Cells and Blood Constituents.

Metastasis is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths and despite measurable progress in the field, underlying mechanisms are still not fully understood. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) disseminate within the bloodstream, where most of them die due to the attack of the immune system. On the other hand, recent evidence shows active interactions between CTCs and platelets, myeloid cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and other hematopoietic cells that secrete immunosuppressive cytokines, which aid CTCs to evade the immune system and enable metastasis. Platelets, for instance, regulate inflammation, recruit neutrophils, and cause fibrin clots, which may protect CTCs from the attack of Natural Killer cells or macrophages and facilitate extravasation. Recently, a correlation between the commensal microbiota and the inflammatory/immune tone of the organism has been stablished. Thus, the microbiota may affect the development of cancer-promoting conditions. Furthermore, CTCs may suffer phenotypic changes, as those caused by the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, that also contribute to the immune escape and resistance to immunotherapy. In this review, we discuss the findings regarding the collaborative biological events among CTCs, immune cells, and microbiome associated to immune escape and metastatic progression.

Cáncer de mama localmente avanzado: evaluación del tratamiento con quimioterapia neoadyuvante (1997-2003) / Locally advanced breast cancer: evaluation of primary chemotherapy treatment (1997-2003)

En este trabajo se recopiló la información y evaluó la eficacia de la quimioterapia neoadyuvante en cáncer de mama con esquemas utilizados en los últimos seis años en nuestro Departamento. Se seleccionaron 21 pacientes con cáncer de mama localmente avanzado que recibieron quimiterapia neoadyuvante entre 1997-2003 con: FAC, CMF, AC, AT. En 21 pacientes evaluadas la edad promedio fue 53 años, 20 pacientes eran femeninos (90,4 por ciento) 1 paciente masculino (9,5 por ciento). 2 pacientes tenían estadio II-B (9,5 por ciento), 10 estadio III-A (47,6 por ciento, 9 pacientes estadio III-B (42,8 por ciento). 8 pacientes recibieron esquema de FAC (38,0 por ciento), 7 AC (33,3 por ciento), 4 esquema AT(19,0 por ciento) y 2 pacientes recibieron CMF (9,5 por ciento). Sólo 2 pacientes tuvieron respuesta completa (9,5 por ciento), 10 respuesta parcial (47,6 por ciento), 7 pacientes estabilización de la enfermedad (33,3 por ciento) y en 2 pacientes progresión de enfermedad (9,5 por ciento). A 17 pacientes se les pudo realizar mastectomía radical, en 1 paciente tratamiento preservador y 3 pacientes no se operaron (1 se negó a la cirugía y en 2 por progresión de la enfermedad). Recibieron radioterapia posoperatoria 18 pacientes (85,71 por ciento) 3 no recibieron radioterapia (14,28 por ciento). La quimioterapia neoadyuvante provee una valoración del efecto antitumoral in vivo, mejora la estadificación descendiente del tumor (de inoperable y de radical a conservadora), además nos da una oportunidad para evaluar objetivos biológicos sustitutivos